Search for: "Heritage Coast Properties, LLC" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Amerada Hess Corporation, No. 100091, 17th JDC (Judgment on PXP Gulf Coast LLC and PXP Louisiana LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on the Subsequent Purchaser Doctrine (November 25, 2015)). [read post]
Amerada Hess Corporation, No. 100091, 17th JDC (Judgment on PXP Gulf Coast LLC and PXP Louisiana LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment Based on the Subsequent Purchaser Doctrine (November 25, 2015)). [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:11 am by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
One-fifth of the offshore wind energy potential of the East Coast is located off the New England coast and Nantucket Sound receives strong, steady Atlantic winds year round. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
Ams., LLC (In re Miller), 570 F.3d 633, 639 (5th Cir.2009) ("[P]erceived poor drafting [in BAPCPA] should not be regarded as a license to invalidate plain-text readings in the name of fixing a statute that some believe is broken. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eric Goldman
  Intersal designated Nautilus Productions, LLC, owned by petitioner Frederick Allen, to document the project. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am by steven perkins
Introduction In his Presidential Proclamation last month honoring National Native American Heritage Month, President Obama recommitted ? [read post]
In prior studies, a portion of the project site had been identified as a significant heritage resource, and prior consultants believed that the site met the requirements for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources. [read post]
In prior studies, a portion of the project site had been identified as a significant heritage resource, and prior consultants believed that the site met the requirements for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources. [read post]
In prior studies, a portion of the project site had been identified as a significant heritage resource, and prior consultants believed that the site met the requirements for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources. [read post]
In prior studies, a portion of the project site had been identified as a significant heritage resource, and prior consultants believed that the site met the requirements for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources. [read post]
Relying on the existing baseline of a fully-operational plant in accordance with North Coast Rivers Alliance v. [read post]